When Are Executive Agreements Used

Margolis, who analyzes all international agreements concluded from 1943 to 1977, provides empirical support and finds that the distribution of seats in the Senate is very predictable between the treaties and the executive agreements of Congress. Footnote 48 The findings form the basis of the circumvention hypothesis that the choice between contracts and executive agreements is exclusively the function of national legislative assistance. Let`s look at the first ex-post executive agreements of Congress. As mentioned above, ex-congress executive agreements are rare, with a share of less than 1 percent in 1980 and 2000. Table 6 contains results on the contract indicator coefficient when the model is executed separately on ex-post congressional executive agreements and all other international commitments. Footnote 101 While most model specifications suggest that there may be a permanence difference between ex post congress executive agreements and contracts, this difference is much smaller and statistically insignificant. In each model specification containing other executive agreements, the difference is significant and statistically significant. As a result, the evidence is consistent with the view that the differences between the treaties and the executive agreements of Congress for ex post executive agreements are less pronounced. Nevertheless, it cannot be concluded that there is certainly no difference between treaties and ex post-Congress executive agreements. Failure to reject the zero hypothesis differs from the evidence of the zero hypothesis. The number of ex post executive agreements in the sample is small. Therefore, the failure to reject the zero hypothesis may be due simply to large standard errors due to data scarcity. This is especially true for models (2) (5), which include a large number of covariates, resulting in data savings in many subgroups.

The fact that almost all model specifications provide negative coefficients certainly allows a larger number of data to obtain a statistically significant difference, although a small one. The prevailing view is that agreement between congressional executives can in any event be used as an alternative to the contractual method. The procedure to be followed is a political judgment that will be rendered in the first place by the President, subject to the possibility that the Senate will refuse to consider a joint resolution of Congress to approve an agreement and insists that the President present the agreement in the form of a treaty. Footnote 37 Executive agreements – that is, international agreements between heads of state or their representatives, usually without Parliament`s consent – are not explicitly allowed in the Constitution. The Constitution remains silent on international agreements, unless it gives the President, in cooperation with the Senate, the power to conclude and conclude treaties. Nevertheless, the principle that the U.S. contractual capacity for negotiation and signature is not exhausted has long been established. This principle has been recognized several times in the real direction of U.S. foreign policy since the beginning of the Republic. Since the mid-19th century, but especially since World War II, the application of executive agreements in U.S. practice has increasingly spent more and more of the application of treaties. 105 For example, HeinOnlines U.S.

Treaty s. Treaty s Library provides access to the full text of a large number of international agreements. Now let`s look at the case of executive agreements alone. As noted above, the TIF does not distinguish between the executive agreements of Congress, although the estimated share of the first agreements is between 5 and 6% of all agreements.

Comments are closed.